Dying City in Los Angeles

May 21st, 2013

Charles McNulty, Los Angeles Times: Illuminating large-scale public concerns through the microscopic examination of individual behavior, Shinn finds political meaning in psychological patterns… Combining the scrupulous attention to detail of a fine short story writer with the imaginative freedom of a path-breaking dramatist, Shinn proves himself to be an indispensable guide, a dramatist whose work throws acute light on the internal havoc driving our American waywardness.

Pauline Adamek, LA Weekly: Sophisticated and elusive, presenting only tantalizing fragments and expecting you to make the connections and piece the backstory together. The language is raw and real — people really do talk this way — and Shinn perfectly captures the discomfort of a relationship that exists only through a marital connection yet becomes cathected and extremely complicated.

Don Grigware, Broadway World: Dying City takes its meaning from Craig’s description of Iraq during the American occupation, but its symbolism may be extended to include any place whose victims face consistent threats. A play of great complexity and sorrow with little humor, yet totally worthy of your attention.

Tom Chaits, Stage and Cinema: A deep look into our culture of victimization… The ambiguities that abound in Dying City may leave the viewer with an empty feeling at first, but as with life, time and reflection fill the void with a resounding and resonating truth.

Laurie Okin and Burt Grinstead

Laurie Okin and Burt Grinstead

 

Four in Toronto

May 18th, 2013

Joshua Sanchez’s movie adaptation of Four screens at the Toronto LGBT Film Festival on May 30th. In an advance review Robert Bell of exclaim.ca writes, “In having captured the pain of youthful insecurity and the nature of socially imposed self-hatred, in addition to understanding the need to replace unfulfilled familial affections with hollow sex, Sanchez has crafted a thoughtful and timely work.”

EJ Bonilla

EJ Bonilla

 

Two New Interviews

May 16th, 2013

In advance of Dying City at Rogue Machine in Los Angeles, I spoke to Rob Kendt at the LA Times and Bill Raden at the LA Weekly.

Laurie Okin and Burt Grinstead

Laurie Okin and Burt Grinstead

Four Around the World

March 29th, 2013

Four has recently played in London, Guadalajara, Amsterdam, Melbourne, and soon shows in ClevelandSouth Africa and Poland.

four-9

Emory Cohen

Teddy Ferrara Closes

March 3rd, 2013

Evan Cabnet’s beautiful world premiere production of Teddy Ferrara plays its final performance today, March 3, 2013. A big thank you to all who saw it, and especially those who reached out to share your thoughts! For those of you who wanted to see it but missed it, TCG is publishing the text this summer; it’s available for pre-order on Amazon now.

_DSC0087

AMA, Visual AIDS, and Raven Foundation Interviews

February 24th, 2013

As Teddy Ferrara enters its next to last weekend, I answered questions for the Goodman’s first AMA, Visual AIDS, and from Maura Junuis for the Raven Foundation.

Liam Benzvi and Ryan Heindl

Liam Benzvi and Ryan Heindl

Ask Me Anything, Buzzfeed, and the Courant

February 17th, 2013

The Goodman is taking your questions about me through the weekend: tweet them anything you want to know @goodmantheatre or post on their Facebook page. Also in the last few days: I spoke to Buzzfeed about Teddy Ferrara’s themes, and wrote an op-ed about violence for the Hartford Courant.

Ryan Heindl

Ryan Heindl

Four Acquired

February 14th, 2013

Joshua Sanchez‘s movie adaptation of my play Four has been acquired for distribution by Wolfe Releasing!

YouTube Preview Image

Teddy Ferrara in Chicago

February 14th, 2013

Rebecca Sarwate, Edge Chicago: There are no clear answers or neat happy endings, nor is that Shinn’s intent. There are so many topical elements incorporated into this drama, yet never at the expense of solid, eager storytelling. Shinn brings it all without leaving the least impression of effort.

Karim Tonsy, Cheeky Chicago: This play is a must-see. Although you may not leave the theatre with an answer, you will leave with so much to contemplate, work on, and hope for in the future.

Jonathan Abarbanel, WBEZ: A play that has a great deal to say, a seriousness of purpose, and insight into how human nature works. Exceptionally strong and important.

Tracy Baim, Windy City Times: Teddy Ferrara may be difficult for audiences, LGBTQ and straight, to grasp. No one is a clear hero, and no one a clear villain. Good plays, like life, don’t come wrapped in a bow with easy solutions or one-dimensional heroes.

Zach Freeman, Newcity Stage: Subtle and poignant. Tackles heavy subject matter with a solid dose of unexpected comedy. Should lead to the kinds of deeper thought and discussions that tragedy deserves.

Kris Vire, Time Out Chicago: Galvanizing. Shinn’s points that martyrdom is reductive and that sexuality is too often scrubbed free of sex are well taken. Frank, unbowdlerized considerations of vital LGBT issues.

YouTube Preview Image

Unedited Time Out Chicago Interview

February 13th, 2013

Time Out Chicago interviewed me recently; below, my responses to the questions.

 
1. The discussion around bullying and gay teen suicides often happen in the context of media reports and how parents and educators might better serve this population. In Teddy Ferrara we get the point of the view of queer students. Talk about the decision to explore these issues largely from their viewpoint.
 

I’m not so far away from my late adolescence yet, and I remember pretty vividly what it feels like to be 20 or 21. And at the time I wrote the play, I was going through some personal difficulties that were stimulating lots of memories from that period of my life. So it just seemed natural to explore these issues, which had occupied me for a long time, from the perspective of college students. That many of them are queer probably has most to do with my being gay!

 
2. Piggybacking on question #1, often when a gay teen commits suicide there’s a question of where to place the blame. In Teddy Ferrara the emphasis is on how the youth themselves are in need of inner work and self-reflection. Discuss why that’s an important conversation to have.
 

I think once you realize that some people who suffer tremendous trauma and abuse don’t kill themselves, and some people who seem to suffer much less trauma and abuse do, you start to think about the incredible complexity of the psyche. You ask basic questions like, why do people act the way they do? Why does one person respond to an experience of oppression one way, another person a different way? I think once you take the psyche as a starting point, naturally you begin to focus on internal dynamics as much external factors in determining behavior.

 
3. There’s also a lot of internalized homophobia happening in the play. In Teddy Ferrara, is that a critique of a society that is failing its queer youth or an inevitability all queer people have to work through?
 

The ways we internalize oppression are fascinating to me and something I still find very confusing. It’s so hard to untangle what is a genuine unconscious repetition of an experience of oppression we’ve suffered, and how much we use that oppression as an excuse to act in similarly abusive or destructive ways. I remember my college boyfriend telling me about how awful his parents were to him — emotional abuse of a harrowing nature. But at the same time, when his behavior towards me became cruel, I went back and forth between thinking he was merely repeating what was done to him, and thinking he was using what was done to him as an excuse to be similarly powerful and controlling. To this day I don’t really have a definitive answer about this, so it’s something I continue to explore in my work, especially in this play. Obviously society is still very homophobic, but our knowledge that homophobia — like parental abuse — is a bad thing means that we are more prone, even if unconsciously, to use that knowledge as an excuse for our own aggressive behavior.

 
4. There’s a debate in the play over whether or not Teddy Ferrara is a victim of homophobia and/or bullying or whether it’s something else entirely. How much of that discussion is your own response to the Tyler Clementi incident and are you specifically critiquing an impulse from different communities to seek out a scapegoat in instances like these?
 

Well certainly the Tyler Clementi story stimulated profound feelings in me. I remember feeling suicidal at his age, and afterwards, and I tried very hard to imagine what his inner experience was based on the information I was able to find about his life. When I saw that the initial impulse from many people seemed to be to sentimentalize him — flatten his psyche and turn him into a pure victim of a cruel roommate — I became very suspicious. I think the impulse towards scapegoating allows us to flee self-scrutiny. Even if the scapegoat is guilty of doing something wrong, if we focus too much on the evil person, we lose an opportunity to think more deeply about who we are and what we don’t want to think about in ourselves. The more I learned about Tyler Clementi, the more complex he seemed as a person, and I felt like the urge to scapegoat totally obfuscated this.

 
5. It also feels like the play reveals competing agendas within the LGBT community. Is that something you are specifically trying to address—a community that is more fractured than it often cares to admit?
 

I didn’t consciously try to dramatize the way the gay community is fractured, I think it just reflects my experience of how chaotic things can be when people ostensibly linked by a common experience of oppression but who are in other ways very different come together as a group. It’s usually quite a scene!

 
6. One of the most illuminating aspects of the play its expression of queer sexuality and the way it plays out as both raw desire and the result of underlying motivation. Is that something our society at large is still failing to address when discussing issues effecting queer youth?
 

Society doesn’t seem very comfortable with authentic sexuality in general, let alone with queer youth. One reason I wanted to write a play on these themes for so long was my being frustrated when I saw The Laramie Project and realized that not only did it not represent the victim onstage, it barely touched on sexuality at all. It was a really asexual play. Sex is such a big part of life and especially when writing about queer youth, one has to deal with it directly and honestly.

 
7. Talk about what it was like for you as a playwright to write from the point-of-view of Millennials. I’m an educator myself (I teach at Columbia College) and am always thinking about how to best communicate with this population. What were your goals? What were the challenges?
 

I was teaching undergraduates at the time and I was very attentive to how they were similar to me and how they were different from me. I’ve also had friends in their early and mid 20s for a while now and the experiential overlap and lack of it were things I had come to know pretty intimately. But on the deepest level I just assumed that very little has changed in the psyche in fifteen or twenty years (I’m 37) and that if I wrote honestly from deep in my soul, I’d get most of the details right. I hope I have! At the deepest level, of course, humans remain somewhat of a mystery, and I hope the play respects the complexity of the human psyche in that way as well.

 
8. The casting reveals a multi-racial student cast. Are we meant to consider the ways in which race impacts the issues addressed in the play or is the casting simply meant to reflect the diversity of today’s student population? 
 

When I was younger, I always specified what race a character was when I wrote a play. But over time, in my teaching, I noticed how rare it was for a student of color to write about his or her experience in racial terms, and I was fascinated by how easily students from different racial backgrounds related to one another. So I was open to all races for these characters. Obviously I expect an actor of color to bring his or her unique experience to the character and make sense of the lines I’ve written, but when writing younger characters I no longer think about their racial backgrounds. I wonder if one day the same will be true of characters’ sexualities!